geoflow-auto¶
Todo
This command has not yet been ported to the new APBS syntax (see YAML- and JSON-format input files).
To increase the accuracy of our implicit solvent modeling, we have implemented a differential geometry based geometric flow solvation model (Thomas, 2013). In this model, polar and nonpolar solvation free energies are coupled and the solvent-solute boundary is determined in a self-consistent manner. Relevant references are provided in Recommended reading. This section provides a brief overview of the method.
The solutions for the electrostatic potential \(\phi\) and the characteristic function \(S\) (related to the solvent density) are obtained by minimizing a free energy functional that includes both polar and nonpolar solvation energy terms. Minimization of the functional with respect to \(\phi\) gives the Poisson-Boltzmann equation with a dielectric coefficient \(\epsilon\) has the solute value \(\epsilon_m\) where \(S = 1\) and the solvent value \(\epsilon_s\) where \(S = 0\). Minimization of the free energy functional with respect to \(S\) gives
where \(\gamma\) is the microscopic surface tension, \(p\) is the hydrostatic pressure, and \(U^{att}\) is the attractive portion of the van der Waals dispersion interaction between the solute and the solvent.
Keywords for this calculation type include:
Warning
Although the ion
and lpbe
keywords will be accepted in the geoflow-auto calculation, the treatment of salt is not currently implemented in APBS geometric flow.
Todo
Add LPBE/NPBE support to geometric flow or remove the ion
and lpbe
keywords.
Documented in https://github.com/Electrostatics/apbs/issues/491
Todo
If there’s only one mode, then we can change the keyword from geoflow-auto
to just geoflow
.
Documented in https://github.com/Electrostatics/apbs/issues/492